After a detailed investigation of Bazowin781.pro carried out on 17 April 2026, serious concerns were raised about its operations. The findings point to licensing inconsistencies, questionable ownership claims, and technical signals that suggest elevated risk for players interacting with the platform.
Licensing Claims And Regulatory Gaps
Bazowin781.pro presents itself as a regulated casino, but our review found that its licensing claims do not match verified records. The site references both Curaçao and UK Gambling Commission approval, yet no valid authorization from either regulator could be confirmed.

The investigation highlights that the casino displays conflicting operator details across different pages. One section states ownership by TechSolutions Group N.V., while another refers to Long Island N.V. as the operator.

These inconsistencies extend further when licensing numbers are examined, with multiple references that do not align with official registry data.
One statement included on the website reads:
"bazowin781.pro is owned and operated by TechSolutions Group N.V., registration number: 144920, registered address: Abraham Mendez Chumaceiro Boulevard 50, Willemstad, Curaçao. Payment agent company is TechSolutions (CY) Group Limited with address Parthenonos 5, PARNERA GARDENS 11, Flat 103, Strovolos, 2020 Nicosia, Cyprus, and Registration number: HE 377018."

However, the investigation notes that this claim conflicts with licensing records and company registry information. In addition, a different section states:
"Long Island N.V. has an application (OGL/2024/1451/0918) for a gaming license in progress with the Curaçao Gaming Authority. Until that process is concluded, based on a transitional arrangement outlined in the National Ordinance on Games of Chance (Landsverordening op de Kansspelen, P.B. 2024, no. 157), the company is permitted to continue its operations under this Certificate of Operation."

These overlapping claims create uncertainty about who actually operates the platform and under what legal framework it functions.
Technical Findings and Game Provider Concerns
Beyond licensing issues, the review identified technical signs that raise concerns about the authenticity of the platform’s game library. The investigation reports evidence suggesting that several renowned game studios may be represented through unauthorized or altered integrations.
Providers listed in the findings include Evoplay, 1Win, Pragmatic Play, Mirror Image Gaming, Hacksaw Gaming, and BGaming. According to the technical review, game files showed irregularities such as modified scripts and missing links to official provider servers.
Evoplay

1Win

Pragmatic Play

Mirror Image Gaming

Hacksaw Gaming

BGaming

The report notes manipulated JavaScript files, no official provider servers and game source mismatch.
These points indicate that the games presented on the platform may not be directly sourced from the original developers, which can affect fairness and transparency.
Account Verification and User Risk Indicators
Another concern identified during the investigation relates to the platform’s account verification flow. Instead of standard identity checks, the process described on the site requests financial deposits as part of verification.
The steps outlined include:
Step 1: Start Verification

Step 2: Data Input

Step 3: Data Checking

Step 4: Verification Complete

At the final stage, users are told:
"A simplified online verification procedure that requires you to make a deposit of $200 or more. Once the deposit is credited to your balance, verification will be completed."
This approach differs from standard industry practices, where identity verification relies on documentation such as ID and proof of address rather than payment requirements.
Affiliate Claims and Activity Patterns
The platform also promotes an affiliate program promising fixed payments per registration and ongoing revenue from betting activity. However, the investigation found no verified evidence of such a program operating within established iGaming networks.

There are also concerns about betting activity displayed on the site. The platform shows user wins and bets that appear unusually large and frequent, which may not reflect typical player behavior.

Additionally, inconsistencies in company registration status were noted, including references to entities whose official registration had been discontinued or expired before the reported activity.
Final Assessment
Based on the findings, we at LCB conclude that Bazowin781.pro presents multiple risk indicators across licensing, ownership transparency, technical integrity, and user account handling. The combination of conflicting operator claims, questionable regulatory references, and deposit-based verification raises serious concerns for anyone considering engagement with the platform.
Players are advised to treat the site with caution and carefully assess any financial exposure before interacting with it.
Play responsibly!